Should the Public Defender of Rights (ombudsman) find that the announcement of the whistleblower contains facts suggesting that a criminal act was committed, especially in the case of a criminal act in the area of corruption, the Public Defender of Rights forwards whistleblower’s announcement to the police.
If it was the ombudsman who would submit the justified announcement to the criminal law enforcement authorities, those authorities could not postpone such announcement as it often happens in case where the announcement is lodged by the public officer as a private person.
Sources:
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing is not snitching, A Guide not only for whistleblowers, September 2014, p. 57
- REST. Depolitisation of the civil service, Reconstruction of the State [online], 2013, principle 4
- Transparency International: International Principles for Whistleblower Legislation – Best Practices for Laws to Protect Whistleblowers and Support Whistleblowing in the Public Interest, 2013, p. 6 and 11
- Oživení: Whistleblower protection, Analysis developed for the purpose of preparation of new legal regulation in Czech Republic, 2011, p. 33 - 37, 60 – 64
- Transparency International Czech Republic: Whistleblowing and the protection of whistleblowers in the Czech Republic, November 2009, p. 15 – 17
- Vondráček, O., Havrda, M., 21 recipes – Anti-corruption cookbook, Recipe 12: Corruption whistleblowing, December 2013
More about methodology
Justification and sources